Pages

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Visitor or Resident?


I consider myself to be a visitor due to the fact that I don't have much free time and I still am not quite sure how to use these tools effectively.  I guess, whenever I feel more comfortable using tweeting, it could be a good tool to promote some of the ideas I have professionally.

 But, I really don't like when people- who may be considered as residents-  use these tools to share announcements that are insignificant and silly! I  don't think I will ever become a resident.

Saturday, October 22, 2011

My Journey Toward Culturally Proficient Leadership Practices




What are you noticing about your personal and professional journeys toward culturally proficient leadership practices? What's emerging for you as you read about the Tools for Cultural Proficiency?

I have noticed that people at my site they are paying attention to what I say and what I do.  Based on this awareness, I am bringing up more conversations around the issues related to cultural proficiency.  In fact during one of our School Site leader ship meetings, while I was waiting for the meeting to begin, I was holding the Cultural proficiency book reading it.  One of the parents asked me about what I was reading and that initiated an interesting conversation around social justice issue and how we need to become aware of the needs of other culture.  Interestingly enough, the conversation continued when the principal arrived and became one of the topics of our discussion for the meeting.

Friday, October 21, 2011

Futurist Scenario


My futurist scenario is providing math teachers with effective collaboration within our PLCs.  We have been working to create some kind of structure and planned activities for teachers during our PLCs, but we have been struggling to implement sustained intentional activities with specific focus and accountability for math teachers in all grades.  Absence of sufficient time has been the main problem. 
  1. If you were to implement this practice, strategy, idea today, what specialized skills, resources, and dispositions would you need to obtain for yourself, your colleagues and staff?
Time is the first resource we need for this plan to work.  If we were able to provide teachers with sufficient time such as 2 hours per week then teachers could have enough time to participate in activities that are intentionally planned and ongoing.  The  planned activities need to have focus every week, so teachers can have a direction.  Teachers would need to take an inquiry stance, collectively identify what practices they need to enhance, develop lessons and observe each other while they are implementing the lessons. They would need to get together every week and decide on a topic such as critical thinking for students, do their own research, plan lessons, observe each other and provide feedback to each other. Teachers would need structured time built into their workday to get all these activities done. 
Pertaining to strategy, in our first meeting, we would ask teachers to choose a partner to work with.  Then collectively, we would need to research different topics in teaching such as problem solving, levels of questioning, student motivation and engagement, critical thinking and different teaching modalities.  We would vote for one of the topics to be our focus for the next two weeks. Then, with our partner we would plan a lesson, implement the lesson, observe each other and have post observation meeting to provide feedback.

To implement this plan and experience success, we would need teachers who are motivated, skilled, self-learners, and are willing to provide and receive constructive feedback to improve their teaching.  Lastly, and most importantly we would need trust because without trust this plan will not even start.  In order for teachers to make themselves vulnerable and open their classrooms to their peers, they need to know they are safe.  Trust  will help teachers to manage the uncertainty and risk associated with opening up to their peers and know that their well-being will not be threatened by their peers. 

2.  What skills will your colleagues and those you supervise need in order to be successful in this scenario? Of those skills, which ones are currently being supported through resources such as professional development in your setting? Which ones are missing or minimal? What is currently being supported in your setting that would likely be obsolete in 2020? 

We need time to meet.  We don't have sufficient time yet we have only 45 minutes per week for our PLCs.  Right now, teachers use some of their own time during lunch to meet.  This plan will also need competent teachers who have high sense of self-efficacy.   Currently we have a number of teachers who have these traits, we just need to utilize their skills in the most efficient way. 

3.  In what ways are we unprepared, lacking in resources and staffing, or to what degree are our strategies and underlying values unable to respond effectively to the conditions this scenario represents?

I think we have teachers who are motivated and willing to participate in this plan, and as far as time, it is a matter of building more time into master schedule and/or giving the same prep time to teachers.   I think most teachers at my site trust each other.  The fact that they could have freedom to chose their partner will make it easier for them to trust their peers. 

4. What could we be doing now to leverage this trend to our advantage?

We could explain the plan and its goals to teachers and ask volunteers to participate.  It would be important to explain to teachers that although they could have some extra time to meet, they might have to use some of their own time.  In addition, we could ask teachers to do their own research and come up with topics that they are mostly interested in. 

5.  What would need to happen internally and in the external environment for preparing yourself and those you lead to navigate in this strategic vision? What changes should your organization begin to make? What should it start doing? What should it stop doing?

Internally, I think the first step is to develop more trust and collective efficacy in schools. In doing so, it is necessary to create a risk-free environment in which teachers feel safe to become vulnerable and make mistakes, model behaviors that reflect integrity and show competence.  Also, it is important to increase collective efficacy by highlighting school’s pass successes.  I think it is important to stop focusing on school’s weaknesses and instead utilize a more strengths- based approach and appreciate school’s best quality in the hope to discover more about what we do best .

Friday, October 14, 2011

Project Tomorrow and Speak Up


The TESS Initiative (Technology Enhancing Student Success) is one of the resources I found in project tomorrow and Speak up.  This initiative aims to help schools to close the achievement gap through teacher training focused on technology integration strategies as well as the use of technology for the assessment of school data. The purpose of the TESS Initiative is to help schools better leverage technology resources to enhance teaching and learning at all levels.


Program Description
Teachers participate in a mandatory project-based teacher training through-out the school year with a focus on technology skills of the teachers as well as the students' needs. This training sessions include:

  • The Technology and Learning Paradigm
  • Hardware and Software Use
  • Personal Productivity and Classroom Use
  • Instructional Delivery
  • Technology and Curriculum Standards
  • The Internet and Learning
  • Technology and the Home to School Connection
This is a great way to train teachers to become comfortable using  assessment data and making informed instructional decisions. Teachers often shy away from using technology in classrooms due the lack of training in using technology.  This training can provide teachers with the confidence they need to use technology more frequently and integrate technology into the curriculum and student assessment.

Creating My PLN



I must confess, I feel pretty good about knowing all these technology tools.  Now I have to spend some  time playing around and learning each which I plan to do when I have some spare time! Did I say spare time? I wonder when that will arrive?


O.K. It has been few weeks now and I have learned to use some of these tools!  I like blogging but I am not too sure about tweeting.  Every time I get an email that someone is following me, I ask myself why?:) I feel a bit uncomfortable sharing my real thoughts with public, I feel I need to be politically correct all the time or someone crazy can follow me!


I still need to learn about diigo and bookmarking!  
I am looking forward to having some free time during holidays and playing around with these tools! 


So, I have been coming back to my PLN blog periodically to add more of my insights.  I actually am starting to like blogging and tweeting! With blogging, I am forced to reflect more often and with tweeting,  I feel little more safe to post something now!  Jeff said something that helped me and that, "think as your superintendent was going to read your post"! 

Today I signed up for The Educator's PLN
The personal learning network for educators!  I feel this network would be a great way to connect with other educators!


My Understanding of Theory of Disruption





Christensen relates the problems in our education system to the budget issues, computer shortage, lack of parent support, ineffective teaching, teaches’ union and problems of standardized tests.  While he explains that these issues are also prevalent in countries that continue to outperform our students, he brings up a point that these issues cannot merely be responsible for the problem we have with our education system in U.S. 

The theory of disruption explains how people interact with each other and react to changes and form their behavior.  Christensen who develops this theory first in the business world attempts to apply the theory to our education system.
He explains that in our education system disruption is the positive force of innovation that challenges schools to employ student-centric approach as opposed to using the same instruction to all students regardless of individual learning needs.  His argument is based on the theory of multiple intelligence which asserts students learn in numerous modalities. 
He argues that schools should customize education for each student’s learning style so students have opportunities to learn in ways that match their intelligence type.   While he recognizes schools’ limitations, he argues that computer-based learning could be a possibility to meet individual learning needs.
If my understanding is correct this theory suggests using more computers and less interaction between teachers and students and a complete change of classroom structure.  I think it is necessary to use student-center approach to teaching especially in math and science and use computers, but only as a supplement to good teaching.  For example, this year, we got smart boards in our classrooms.  This is a great technology tool to check student understanding and so far everyone is excited and on board with this innovation.

Reflection on Daniel Pink's "six senses"




As I read the six senses-story, design, symphony, meaning, and play, I asked myself what does this mean for what we do in our schools as teachers and leaders. 
 Applying the notion of symphony to me is creating strong and productive collaboration among teachers. From leaders' perspective, it is about motivating, influencing and capitalizing on human resources in schools which will lead to  powerful teamwork.  Without  powerful collaboration, teaches will be doing their own thing and the end result would not be beneficial to teachers particularly to our students.
Symphony is also about putting pieces that may seem to be unrelated together and creating a useful  product. When I think about applying this concept to my work place and colleagues, I can think of something new that we are doing to improve our teaching practice.  I volunteered in a cadre (group of teachers cross grade levels and curriculum) come together and decide on a topic that they need to improve on.  A language arts teacher and I got together and decided to observe each other regarding to teaching critical thinking skills to our students.  She observed me and I observed her yesterday.  It was amazing to see how this concept of critical thinking can be reinforced in all subjects and teachers cross curriculum can learn from each other.  We will get together next week to discuss our observations and provide each other with feedback.  Next we will share that with other groups of this study team.  I think this is a great example of symphony and design for improving teaching practice.

Applying the notion of design to schools means becoming aware and intentional about the changes we want to make and the details of implementing those changes.  For example, implementing PLCs as a new form of professional development for teachers needs time, planned activities, specific targets and accountability. We need to be aware that process of innovation in our schools requires time, money and strategic planning.
One idea to motivate colleagues and constituents to participate in the symphony of collaboration is by turning them loose but keeping them accountable.  For example, a new idea about visiting each other's classroom can motivate teachers to participate in this activity if it is voluntarily. This design is actually developing at my school by the new principal. He has asked for volunteer to visit each other's classrooms one day a week and he is providing visiting teachers with subs

My Futurist Action Plan

write

Friday, October 7, 2011

Theory of Disruption


Theory of Disruption

Christensen relates the problems in our education system to the budget issues, computer shortage, lack of parent support, ineffective teaching, teaches’ union and problems of standardized tests.  While he explains that these issues are also prevalent in countries that continue to outperform our students, he brings up a point that these issues cannot merely be responsible for the problem we have with our education system in U.S. 

The theory of disruption explains how people interact with each other and react to changes and form their behavior.  Christensen who develops this theory first in the business world attempts to apply the theory to our education system.
He explains that in our education system disruption is the positive force of innovation that challenges schools to employ student-centric approach as opposed to using the same instruction to all students regardless of individual learning needs.  His argument is based on the theory of multiple intelligence which asserts students learn in numerous modalities. 
He argues that schools should customize education for each student’s learning style so students have opportunities to learn in ways that match their intelligence type.   While he recognizes schools’ limitations, he argues that computer-based learning could be a possibility to meet individual learning needs.
If my understanding is correct this theory suggests using more computers and less interaction between teachers and students and a complete change of classroom structure.  I think it is necessary to use student-center approach to teaching especially in math and science and use computers, but only as a supplement to good teaching.  For example, this year, we got smart boards in our classrooms.  This is a great technology tool to check student understanding and so far everyone is excited and on board with this innovation